The Handcuffs and Restraints Guidelines PROCEDURES: 1. Use of restraining devices is mandatory on all prisoners, unless in the officer’s judgment unusual circumstances exists which make the use of restraining devices impossible or unnecessary (e.g. prisoner is handicapped, etc.) 2. Where feasible, prisoners should always be cuffed with hands behind the back in accordance with established standards for handcuffing. Metal handcuffs are to double-locked after they are placed on the subject to prevent the cuffs from tightening. 3. All types of cuffs and restraining devices shall be applied with caution to prevent accidental or incidental injury to the subject being handcuffed. If they are placed on the subject too loosely, the prisoner will be able to free his hand(s) and become a threat to or escape from the officer. If they are applied too tight, they may cause injury to the prisoner and be difficult to remove. 4. Once restrained with handcuffs, the prisoner should not be further restrained unless the prisoner continues to attempt injury to responding officers and/or other persons in the area. Should this occur, leg restraints shall also be used. They shall not be secured to the prisoner’s handcuffs in a “hogtie” fashion. 5. Once the […] → Full article Handcuffs and restraints guidelines
What can you do if the police refuse to investigate a crime? EBOOKSRESOURCES December 9, 2016 It’s a sad indictment of modern law enforcement when there is a need for an article entitled: “What can you do if the police refuse to investigate a crime?” but when you consider that half of all crime in the Australian goes unreported, it’s reasonable to suggest that at least 50% of the population already know what I’m talking about… Unfortunately, the reality is that the police have become extremely selective about the types of crime they are willing to devote their allegedly scant resources too. Particularly where they believe those crimes will require considerable effort and skill to resolve. They blame this inaction squarely on government cuts, despite figures released by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) that shows there has only been a 6% decrease in frontline police numbers since 2010. Also with the introduction of the Fraud Act the police have effectively been given the green light to sweep the biggest growing category of crime in the Australia– Fraud – directly under the carpet. That carpet being the Action Fraud website, where all low level reports of fraud go to die. […] → Full article Dealing with police
THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF COURT Canon 3228 A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law, but by presumptions of the law. Therefore, if presumptions presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted they become fact and are therefore said to stand true [Or as “truth in commerce”]. There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public Record, Public Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court of Trustees, Government as Executor/Beneficiary, Executor De Son Tort, Incompetence, and Guilt: The Presumption of Public Recordis that any matter brought before a lower Roman Courts is a matter for the public record when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private Bar Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business matter. Unless openly rebuked and rejected by stating clearly the matter is to be on the Public Record, the matter remains a private Bar Guild matter completely under private Bar Guild rules; and The Presumption of Public Serviceis that all the members of the Private Bar Guild who have all sworn a solemn secret absolute oath to their Guild then […] → Full article The 12 presumptions of court
Cestui Que Vie London 1666, during the black plague and great fires of London, Parliament enacted an act behind closed doors, called Cestui Que Vie Act 1666. The act being debated was to subrogate the rights of men and women, meaning all men and women were declared dead, lost at sea/beyond the sea. (back then operating in Admiralty law, the law of the sea, so lost at sea). The state (London) took custody of everybody and their property into a trust. The state became the trustee/husband holding all titles to the people and property, until a living man comes back to reclaim those titles, he can also claim damages. When CAPITAL letters are used anywhere in a name this always refers to a legal entity/fiction, Company or Corporation no exceptions. e.g. John DOE or Doe: JANE 1) CEST TUI QUE TRUST: (pronounced setakay) common term in New Zealand and Australia 2) STRAWMAN: common term in United States of America or Canada These are the legal entity/fiction created and owned by the Government whom created it. It is like owning a share in the Stock Market, you may own a share… but it is still a share of the Stock. Legally, […] → Full article Birth certificate fraud
DO YOU KNOW WHO OWNS YOUR CAR BECAUSE IT’S NOT YOU ! Your only the registered keeper your minding it for the owner government, as the minder that does not make you liable for someone property so all road tax insurance is down to the owner to sort out not you the minder . Movable property A person’s is guilty of theft if he unlawfully takes or excersise unlawful control over movable property of another with the intent to deprive him or any intent to benefit himself or another not entitled thereto, meaning these truffles take your car off you their guilty of theft because other private companies benefit from your loss so bill the truffle in his or her own personnel capacity for theft and for intrusion into your privacy without your expressed written consent, show me a law that says private company employees can take your property for other private companies financial gain ?
#POST #FOR #AUSTRALIA #NUMBER 129 I was laying in bed this morning thinking about how wonderful Our Politicians are… How they #Deceived The People into having a Law for Gay People to get married ~ This Post is Not about attacking Gays. It seams that We Have #The #Most #Over #Educated #Bunch of #Fools in the Whole World Sitting Right Here in Our Parliament. First, in 1973 they passed laws that created the Queen of Australia, then the Act that makes us Gender Neutral Persons, then the Sunken Land Act… Nor are we #Ships of #Commerce #Floating on the #Sea of #Commerce So we can be dealt with in #AdmiraltyLaw. Then, #Liberal, #National, #Greens and #Labor Conspired Together to Wipe those laws out with #One #Law for the #Gays. Now for the change from them. THERE IS NO LONGER ANY Queen OF AUSTRALIA as that #Denotes a #Gender without Her, His or its consent. You can no longer be called or classed as a #GenderNeutralPerson under the Corporations Act as that would Define you as No Gender when the New Law Grants You that Right to #Decide. So No More, Sir, Madam, He, She, Man, Woman, Boy, Girl, Mr, Mrs, […] → Full article Wayne Glew