1 2 3 5

The commonwealth constitution 1900uk

POST FOR AUSTRALIA NUMBER 134 The Official True Law of This Country is; The Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900 UK. This act was derived from the draft of the Constitution put together by Australians for Australians. Queen Victoria and the British Parliament added 9 Clauses and several other parts to control the Colonial Parliaments during and after Federation. The extra parts were added by Victoria 28 and 29, which included a Preamble. The People of Six Colonies accepted the Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900 UK, including the 9 Clauses and the Preamble by Referendum. This Constitution was put in place by a Letters Patent by Queen Victoria and included all State Constitutions in their Original Form and a Letters Patent putting in place the Office of Governor. This took place on the 29th of October 1900, coming into effect on the 1st of January 1901. This document called a Constitution, is a #Covenant between the #Crown and #ThePeople of the New Federated Colony, which is #Indisolvable by way of the Preamble – being as #WeThePeople. The States were created by 107, 108 and 109 of the New Constitution and derive their authority from it. Ref HCA 48 of 1996 at Paragraph 17. […] → Full article The commonwealth constitution 1900uk

Swearing and the law

Section 5 Of The Public Order Act 1986: The Impact Of Harvey v DPP The broad scope and low threshold of the offence under section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 makes it frequently prosecuted and familiar to practitioners. The recent case of Harvey v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] All ER (D) 143 (Nov) required the High Court to re-examine the not uncommon situation where a person has been charged with a section 5 offence after swearing at a police officer. The fairly short and ex-tempore judgment provides some fresh guidance on determining whether words will be considered “abusive” under section 5, and when evidence of their impact upon individuals will be required. Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 A section 5 offence comprises two elements: A person must (a) use threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or (b) display any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting; and The words or behaviour, or writing, sign of other visible representation must be within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby. Unique amongst the public order offences in the […] → Full article Swearing and the law

Submission to court

POST FOR AUSTRALIA NUMBER 132 SUBMISSIONS TO COURT IN RELATION TO CASE ON 7TH OF AUGUST 2018 Magistrates Court of Western Australia Case No 333 of 2018 ABN 93 779 861 687 Geraldton (Civil) The Application to the court is from Civic Legal PTY LTD ABN 93 603 564 889 This document in the signature section, states signature of lawyer, but it does not have one. The document has Civic Legal which is not a Lawful signature and does not have a name dispicting the person as required by the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The next document is purported to be an Affidavit of Sandra Lee Russell. This document claims that the Trading Company known as the City of Geraldton ABN 55 907 677 173 seized my land in 2017 and then took possession of property on that land and now has decided to sell the property. No warrant to seize the property and sell it nor a warrant to enter and take possession of personal property has ever been issued by my piers i,e. trial by jury as required by Magna Carta. None exists as none has been issued. This Company has no rights over property of anyone nor […] → Full article Submission to court

Challenge court jurastiction

POST FOR AUSTRALIA NUMBER 131 THIS IS HOW YOU CHALLENGED THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT In relation to the matter before this court being an Application to sell abandoned goods held by the City of Greater Geraldton. I formally challenge your ability firstly to constitute a Lawful Court under State Acts and Statutes. There is no authority for you to sit in Admiralty Law in Our Court nor have we given you any authority. Our authority is We Are The Commonwealth as established under the Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900 UK and the Commonwealth Constitution 1901 which we accepted by Referendum. The State of Western Australia, like every other State did not exist before Federation, they were Colonies and ceased to exist on the proclamation of the Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900 UK by way of Clause 7. In the High Court HCA 48 of 1996 the case of James Andrew McGinty v The State of Western Australia states clearly that the states did not exist prior to Federation they were as I have said Colonies that ceased to exist on the proclamation of the Commonwealth Constitution by Clause 7 of that constitution. The states were established by 107, 108 and 109 […] → Full article Challenge court jurastiction

Credit agreements

CREDIT AGREEMENTS When you sign a credit agreement your the only one that signs it, ever noticed that then they take a photocopy and give you the photocopy or the carbon copy, it’s never the other way around where you keep the copy with your wet ink signature on it, ever wondered why ? Well they need your copy with the wet ink signature to apply for the money they claim their loaning you, the carbon copy you get is worthless, in effect they sell that credit agreement you signed, it’s what called securitising the debt by selling it on, Now the minute they do that the loan / debt is paid for, they just end up getting paid twice by getting you to repay and add interest, their basically charging you for the credit you created with your signature, tut tut ! Now what i do is demand proof their is a valid deb owed in the firm of that wet ink signature contract you signed we demand to see the original not the carbon copy because that’s worthless, now trust me when I say they kick up a stink about this and try everything to avoid supplying the […] → Full article Credit agreements

The secret language called legalese

Legalese is a secret language invented to trick you. It uses English words but attaches secret meanings to those words with the sole intention of stopping you believing that what they are saying to you has nothing to do with the normal meaning in the English language. Their purpose is to cheat you and rob you. For example, they will say to you “Do you understand?” . In English, that means “Do you comprehend what I am saying to you?” and the automatic response would be “Yes”, meaning “I do comprehend what you are saying to me”. But these sneaky, underhand people have changed the meaning in Legalese to mean “Do you stand under me?” meaning “Do you grant me authority over you so that you have to obey whatever I tell you to do?”. What makes it even worse, is the fact that they will never tell you that they have switched from English to Legalese, and if that is not dishonest, underhand and unscrupulous, then I don’t know what is! If you answer the question believing that English is being spoken, then they pretend that you are contracting with them to become subordinate to them. Whether or not […] → Full article The secret language called legalese

Legalese and pig Latin v the people

Legalese and Pig Latin v The people who are made Sovereign by Our Constitution v The Parliament who are Neither Sovereign nor Supreme. I and many others have entered Our Courts and have been slapped in the face with first, Your name in Pig Latin. Second the case is conducted in Legalese. We have never consented to any of the Criminal Rubbish. We have stated No Contract, No Liability which is correct except for one issue – the issue of consent without your knowledge. Do Not think about how they do it because it is in their Acts and Statutes. I have been involved in the court system for 43 years and have seen our system move from Our Rule of Law to their rule of law, meaning the presumption of innocence has been replaced Unlawfully with the Roman system of guilty until you prove you are Not. The relentless attack on my person and my friends over the last couple of weeks by Government Trolls has led me to read all of my previous cases before and after I worked in the Police Force. We have always had the answer to all of their Nonsense. There are Two very […] → Full article Legalese and pig Latin v the people

Debt where it all begins

This is where it all begins, this is most important, YOU MUST NOT CORRESPOND WITH THE DEBT ORIGINATOR IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER, FORGET THE ORIGINATOR OF THE DEBT, THEY DON’T MATTER….. YOU MUST NOT CORRESPOND IN ANY WAY WITH THE DEBT COLLECTION AGENCY/ENFORCEMENT AGENCY AND THEIR AGENTS EXCEPT FOR THE 3 LETTER PROCESS AND ESTOPPEL NOTICE or you will pay the price, what they are trying to make you do is slip up with their intimidating tactics, saying they can do this and they can do that, yeahh right, absolute rubbish, by getting you to correspond with them they are trying to gain joinder, in the eyes of the law joinder is seen as “acceptance” of the alleged debt, there’s basically only one thing they can do to you and that’s take you to court with a recommendation for CCJ’s, all that means is you’ll get a bad credit history and you probably won’t be able to get credit. another very important thing to remember, especially at this point where you’ve just received your first letter from the original company or authority notifying you of your arrears, just completely ignore them, pretend they don’t exist, WAIT until they appoint a […] → Full article Debt where it all begins

Bank debts

Bank Debts. __________ Debts with banks are quite an easy one to deal with, they always appoint debt collection agents, what i want to ask you first of all is, have you corresponded with the bank over this alleged debt or corresponded with debt collection agents? if you have corresponded with either of them it’s not looking good because when you correspond with them in any way whatsoever, even in dispute, it’s seen in the eyes of the law as “acceptance” of the alleged debt, through correspondence with you they gain joinder, a lawfully binding contract. Use the 3 letter process and estoppel notice, i would also recommend the Removal Of Implied Right Of Access Notice as well,

Anyone who supports a foreign power

According to Section 44 of our Constitution ANYONE who supports a foreign power like the UN—CANNOT be in Government office. Turnbull, Bishop, Labor, Greens are all traitors to the Australian Constitution and need to lose their seats immediately. Our judiciary are in breach as well. The UN was started by Communists. It is a foreign Power with its own funding, government and army. It wants to be the dominant World Government. It promotes the rights of children, women and indigenous to cripple the influence families, marriage and especially our men. It wants to destroy private ownership of land and business for global free trade and wealth redistribution. The UN Lima agreement has killed our farmers and manufacturing sectors. It is influencing our judiciary and must be stopped. OUR CONSTITUTION says— “NO to the UN”. Get rid of these traitors…we want our country back.

1 2 3 5

Privacy Notice

Warning - any person and/or institution and/or Agent and/or Agency of any governmental structure including but not limited to the United States Federal Government and/or the Government of the British Isles also using or monitoring/using this website or any of its associated websites, you do NOT have my permission to utilise any of my profile information nor any of the content contained herein including, but not limited to my photos, and/or the comments made about my photos or any other "picture" art posted on my profile. You are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, disseminating, or taking any other action against me with regard to this profile and the contents herein. The foregoing prohibitions also apply to your employee , agent , student or any persons under your direction or control. The contents of this profile are private and legally privileged and confidential information, and the violation of my personal privacy is punishable by United Sates law. UCC 1-103 1-308 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. And by United Kingdom (British) Law. The Human Rights Act 1998 (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents) Human Rights Act 1998 www.legislation.gov.uk An Act to give further effect to rights and freedoms guaranteed under the European Convention on Human Rights; to make provision with respect to holders of certain judicial offices who become judges of the European Court of Human Rights; and for connected purposes.

Valuable links

Use the links below for valuable information on rights and law.
Know your Rights
Exodus
I am some dude
Wayne Glew