The secret language called legalese

Legalese is a secret language invented to trick you. It uses English words but attaches secret meanings to those words with the sole intention of stopping you believing that what they are saying to you has nothing to do with the normal meaning in the English language. Their purpose is to cheat you and rob you. For example, they will say to you “Do you understand?” . In English, that means “Do you comprehend what I am saying to you?” and the automatic response would be “Yes”, meaning “I do comprehend what you are saying to me”. But these sneaky, underhand people have changed the meaning in Legalese to mean “Do you stand under me?” meaning “Do you grant me authority over you so that you have to obey whatever I tell you to do?”. What makes it even worse, is the fact that they will never tell you that they have switched from English to Legalese, and if that is not dishonest, underhand and unscrupulous, then I don’t know what is! If you answer the question believing that English is being spoken, then they pretend that you are contracting with them to become subordinate to them. Whether or not […] → Full article The secret language called legalese

Legalese and pig Latin v the people

Legalese and Pig Latin v The people who are made Sovereign by Our Constitution v The Parliament who are Neither Sovereign nor Supreme. I and many others have entered Our Courts and have been slapped in the face with first, Your name in Pig Latin. Second the case is conducted in Legalese. We have never consented to any of the Criminal Rubbish. We have stated No Contract, No Liability which is correct except for one issue – the issue of consent without your knowledge. Do Not think about how they do it because it is in their Acts and Statutes. I have been involved in the court system for 43 years and have seen our system move from Our Rule of Law to their rule of law, meaning the presumption of innocence has been replaced Unlawfully with the Roman system of guilty until you prove you are Not. The relentless attack on my person and my friends over the last couple of weeks by Government Trolls has led me to read all of my previous cases before and after I worked in the Police Force. We have always had the answer to all of their Nonsense. There are Two very […] → Full article Legalese and pig Latin v the people

Anyone who supports a foreign power

According to Section 44 of our Constitution ANYONE who supports a foreign power like the UN—CANNOT be in Government office. Turnbull, Bishop, Labor, Greens are all traitors to the Australian Constitution and need to lose their seats immediately. Our judiciary are in breach as well. The UN was started by Communists. It is a foreign Power with its own funding, government and army. It wants to be the dominant World Government. It promotes the rights of children, women and indigenous to cripple the influence families, marriage and especially our men. It wants to destroy private ownership of land and business for global free trade and wealth redistribution. The UN Lima agreement has killed our farmers and manufacturing sectors. It is influencing our judiciary and must be stopped. OUR CONSTITUTION says— “NO to the UN”. Get rid of these traitors…we want our country back.

The twelve presumptions of court

THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF COURT Canon 3228 A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law, but by presumptions of the law. Therefore, if presumptions presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted they become fact and are therefore said to stand true [Or as “truth in commerce”]. There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public Record, Public Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court of Trustees, Government as Executor/Beneficiary, Executor De Son Tort, Incompetence, and Guilt: The Presumption of Public Recordis that any matter brought before a lower Roman Courts is a matter for the public record when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private Bar Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business matter. Unless openly rebuked and rejected by stating clearly the matter is to be on the Public Record, the matter remains a private Bar Guild matter completely under private Bar Guild rules; and The Presumption of Public Serviceis that all the members of the Private Bar Guild who have all sworn a solemn secret absolute oath to their Guild then […] → Full article The twelve presumptions of court

reasonable force against intruders

Using reasonable force against intruders You can use reasonable force to protect yourself or others if a crime is taking place inside your home This means you can: Home Crime, justice and the law Your rights and the law Using reasonable force against intruders Home Crime, justice and the law Your rights and the law Using reasonable force against intruders Home Crime, justice and the law Your rights and the law Using reasonable force against intruders You can use reasonable force to protect yourself or others if a crime is taking place inside your home. This means you can: protect yourself ‘in the heat of the moment’ – this includes using an object as a weapon stop an intruder running off – eg tackle them to the ground There’s no specific definition of ‘reasonable force’ – it depends on the circumstances. If you only did what you honestly thought was necessary at the time, this would provide strong evidence that you acted within the law. Read guidance from the Crown Prosecution Service. You don’t have to wait to be attacked before defending yourself in your home. However, you could be prosecuted if, for example, you: carry on attacking the intruder […] → Full article reasonable force against intruders

Frequently used words and phrases in the court room

FEQUENTLY USED WORDS AND PHRASES IN THE COURTROOM Affidavit A written statement made on oath, given in the place of verbal evidence Affirmation A declaration made instead of taking an oath Appellate Court/Jurisdiction Court or Jurisdiction which has the power to hear appeals Application A request made to a Court, eg., application for bail, application for an adjournment Arraign/ Arraignment The reading of the charges to the accused in a criminal matter and the recording of the accused’s answers as to whether he/she pleads guilty or not guilty Balance of probabilities The onus or standard of proof required in civil matters Beyond reasonable doubt The onus of proof required in criminal cases. Burden of proof The obligation to prove what is alleged. In a criminal trial the burden of proof is upon the prosecution, the accused does not have to prove anything. In a civil trial it is the plaintiff or claiming party which has the onus of proof Case Conference A pre-trial hearing which initiates the hearing of the case in Court. Under the guidance of the Judge (in Crime) parties attempt to resolve issues prior to the formal trial commencing Charge (to jury) Directions given to the Jury […] → Full article Frequently used words and phrases in the court room

maritime/admiralty law conspiracy

Maritime Admiralty Law Conspiracy “Nothing in this world, nothing, works the way you think it does. There’s always more to the story.” – Jordan Maxwell Disclaimer: When I wrote this post I had no idea how popular it would become. I found the topic interesting to say the least and I thought my readers would as well. The materials available in this post are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. When you read anything online, don’t let it be the ending point in your research, rather let it be the beginning. I recommend that you do your own research and investigations on any topic and come to your own conclusions. I added source links at the end of this post so you can begin to connect the dots yourself. Is it possible that these nautical terms were merely transferred to the land when transportation became more regionalized with the advent of trains and motor vehicles? It’s very possible. Either way, this post is meant to be food for thought! Maritime Have you noticed how many Maritime words are commonly used today? Maritime words relate to nautical, sea/ocean, shipping, and navigation. The term ‘Nautical’ […] → Full article maritime/admiralty law conspiracy

new method of instituting proceedings

The “new method” of instituting proceedings The Criminal Justice Act created a “new method” of instituting proceedings. After a pilot scheme, all police forces in Australia were given authority to use the new method. Criminal proceedings for summary only offences may be commenced by charge (usually at a police station), summons or the “new method” – Written Charge and Requisition. Alternatively, a Single Justice Procedure Notice may be issued with the Written Charge. Historically, a summons would normally be issued by the court after an “information” is laid at court by the police. The “new method” allows a relevant prosecutor to commence proceedings without reference to the court. A relevant prosecutor may institute criminal proceedings by issuing a document – “a written charge” which charges a person with an offence. Where a relevant prosecutor issues a written charge, it must at the same time issue a “requisition document” – which requires the person to appear before a magistrates’ court to answer the written charge. A requisition may be contained in the same document as a written charge, and contain more than one offence. The written charge and requisition must be served on the person concerned, and a copy of each […] → Full article new method of instituting proceedings

Understanding not guilty

  “Not Guilty” – Do you know what you’re actually saying when uttering these words? Many do not think twice when pleading “Not Guilty” in a court. However, do you truly understand what this means and the impact it has on the matter at hand? The mere fact that a “defendant” is attending court is an admission of guilt as an unresolved controversy exists and the accuser eg the plaintiff believes a wrong exists and requires resolution or compensation from the defendant. Hence, by the act of turning up, the defendant is already guilty. First of all, what is “court”? Simply put, you’re already in court when interacting with the opposite party…you’re there to make law/contract. Hence, the first court appearance has already been held with the opposite party and the reason for a Court appearance in a State/Federal Court is to adjudicate on the controversy created by the defendant according to the plaintiff. Pleading not Guilty. Where does the word “guilty” come from? From Canon Law here Canon 3147 The word Guilty originates from 14th Century English / Dutch gilde, from 13th Century Venetian / Italian gilda meaning “guild, payment (in gold), debt or fine owed to the guild”. […] → Full article Understanding not guilty

Common law v statutes

Common Law vs Statutes Living by the Rule of Law by Roger Hayes Few of us would disagree that the world would be a better place if we all lived by the rule-of-law – but can the same be said about living by the rule of statute? The writer thinks not. In making the case that ‘the law’ benefits our society as a whole but ‘statutes’ benefit special interest groups and have become a negative factor in our lives let me first put forward my views as to what the differences between laws and statutes are. Here follows a summary of my interpretation of the differences (not necessarily in order of importance, sometimes repeated and definitely not exhaustive) – please feel free to challenge me if you disagree. Warning: My assumptions are based on my own logic and reasoning – I have the benefit of not having been ‘trained’ to think like a barrister or a solicitor – in fact I have not been ‘trained’ to think like anybody – I tend to think for myself, which it appears very few people do these days… most preferring it seems to being ‘guided’ conveniently to the same conclusions as the ruling […] → Full article Common law v statutes

Privacy Notice

Warning - any person and/or institution and/or Agent and/or Agency of any governmental structure including but not limited to the United States Federal Government and/or the Government of the British Isles also using or monitoring/using this website or any of its associated websites, you do NOT have my permission to utilise any of my profile information nor any of the content contained herein including, but not limited to my photos, and/or the comments made about my photos or any other "picture" art posted on my profile. You are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, disseminating, or taking any other action against me with regard to this profile and the contents herein. The foregoing prohibitions also apply to your employee , agent , student or any persons under your direction or control. The contents of this profile are private and legally privileged and confidential information, and the violation of my personal privacy is punishable by United Sates law. UCC 1-103 1-308 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. And by United Kingdom (British) Law. The Human Rights Act 1998 ( Human Rights Act 1998 An Act to give further effect to rights and freedoms guaranteed under the European Convention on Human Rights; to make provision with respect to holders of certain judicial offices who become judges of the European Court of Human Rights; and for connected purposes.

Valuable links

Use the links below for valuable information on rights and law.
Know your Rights
I am some dude
Wayne Glew