1 2 3 4

Swearing and the law

Section 5 Of The Public Order Act 1986: The Impact Of Harvey v DPP The broad scope and low threshold of the offence under section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 makes it frequently prosecuted and familiar to practitioners. The recent case of Harvey v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] All ER (D) 143 (Nov) required the High Court to re-examine the not uncommon situation where a person has been charged with a section 5 offence after swearing at a police officer. The fairly short and ex-tempore judgment provides some fresh guidance on determining whether words will be considered “abusive” under section 5, and when evidence of their impact upon individuals will be required. Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 A section 5 offence comprises two elements: A person must (a) use threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or (b) display any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting; and The words or behaviour, or writing, sign of other visible representation must be within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby. Unique amongst the public order offences in the […] → Full article Swearing and the law

Challenge court jurastiction

POST FOR AUSTRALIA NUMBER 131 THIS IS HOW YOU CHALLENGED THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT In relation to the matter before this court being an Application to sell abandoned goods held by the City of Greater Geraldton. I formally challenge your ability firstly to constitute a Lawful Court under State Acts and Statutes. There is no authority for you to sit in Admiralty Law in Our Court nor have we given you any authority. Our authority is We Are The Commonwealth as established under the Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900 UK and the Commonwealth Constitution 1901 which we accepted by Referendum. The State of Western Australia, like every other State did not exist before Federation, they were Colonies and ceased to exist on the proclamation of the Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900 UK by way of Clause 7. In the High Court HCA 48 of 1996 the case of James Andrew McGinty v The State of Western Australia states clearly that the states did not exist prior to Federation they were as I have said Colonies that ceased to exist on the proclamation of the Commonwealth Constitution by Clause 7 of that constitution. The states were established by 107, 108 and 109 […] → Full article Challenge court jurastiction

Credit agreements

CREDIT AGREEMENTS When you sign a credit agreement your the only one that signs it, ever noticed that then they take a photocopy and give you the photocopy or the carbon copy, it’s never the other way around where you keep the copy with your wet ink signature on it, ever wondered why ? Well they need your copy with the wet ink signature to apply for the money they claim their loaning you, the carbon copy you get is worthless, in effect they sell that credit agreement you signed, it’s what called securitising the debt by selling it on, Now the minute they do that the loan / debt is paid for, they just end up getting paid twice by getting you to repay and add interest, their basically charging you for the credit you created with your signature, tut tut ! Now what i do is demand proof their is a valid deb owed in the firm of that wet ink signature contract you signed we demand to see the original not the carbon copy because that’s worthless, now trust me when I say they kick up a stink about this and try everything to avoid supplying the […] → Full article Credit agreements

Debt where it all begins

This is where it all begins, this is most important, YOU MUST NOT CORRESPOND WITH THE DEBT ORIGINATOR IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER, FORGET THE ORIGINATOR OF THE DEBT, THEY DON’T MATTER….. YOU MUST NOT CORRESPOND IN ANY WAY WITH THE DEBT COLLECTION AGENCY/ENFORCEMENT AGENCY AND THEIR AGENTS EXCEPT FOR THE 3 LETTER PROCESS AND ESTOPPEL NOTICE or you will pay the price, what they are trying to make you do is slip up with their intimidating tactics, saying they can do this and they can do that, yeahh right, absolute rubbish, by getting you to correspond with them they are trying to gain joinder, in the eyes of the law joinder is seen as “acceptance” of the alleged debt, there’s basically only one thing they can do to you and that’s take you to court with a recommendation for CCJ’s, all that means is you’ll get a bad credit history and you probably won’t be able to get credit. another very important thing to remember, especially at this point where you’ve just received your first letter from the original company or authority notifying you of your arrears, just completely ignore them, pretend they don’t exist, WAIT until they appoint a […] → Full article Debt where it all begins

Bank debts

Bank Debts. __________ Debts with banks are quite an easy one to deal with, they always appoint debt collection agents, what i want to ask you first of all is, have you corresponded with the bank over this alleged debt or corresponded with debt collection agents? if you have corresponded with either of them it’s not looking good because when you correspond with them in any way whatsoever, even in dispute, it’s seen in the eyes of the law as “acceptance” of the alleged debt, through correspondence with you they gain joinder, a lawfully binding contract. Use the 3 letter process and estoppel notice, i would also recommend the Removal Of Implied Right Of Access Notice as well,

Anyone who supports a foreign power

According to Section 44 of our Constitution ANYONE who supports a foreign power like the UN—CANNOT be in Government office. Turnbull, Bishop, Labor, Greens are all traitors to the Australian Constitution and need to lose their seats immediately. Our judiciary are in breach as well. The UN was started by Communists. It is a foreign Power with its own funding, government and army. It wants to be the dominant World Government. It promotes the rights of children, women and indigenous to cripple the influence families, marriage and especially our men. It wants to destroy private ownership of land and business for global free trade and wealth redistribution. The UN Lima agreement has killed our farmers and manufacturing sectors. It is influencing our judiciary and must be stopped. OUR CONSTITUTION says— “NO to the UN”. Get rid of these traitors…we want our country back.

The twelve presumptions of court

THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF COURT Canon 3228 A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law, but by presumptions of the law. Therefore, if presumptions presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted they become fact and are therefore said to stand true [Or as “truth in commerce”]. There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public Record, Public Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court of Trustees, Government as Executor/Beneficiary, Executor De Son Tort, Incompetence, and Guilt: The Presumption of Public Recordis that any matter brought before a lower Roman Courts is a matter for the public record when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private Bar Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business matter. Unless openly rebuked and rejected by stating clearly the matter is to be on the Public Record, the matter remains a private Bar Guild matter completely under private Bar Guild rules; and The Presumption of Public Serviceis that all the members of the Private Bar Guild who have all sworn a solemn secret absolute oath to their Guild then […] → Full article The twelve presumptions of court

reasonable force against intruders

Using reasonable force against intruders You can use reasonable force to protect yourself or others if a crime is taking place inside your home This means you can: Home Crime, justice and the law Your rights and the law Using reasonable force against intruders Home Crime, justice and the law Your rights and the law Using reasonable force against intruders Home Crime, justice and the law Your rights and the law Using reasonable force against intruders You can use reasonable force to protect yourself or others if a crime is taking place inside your home. This means you can: protect yourself ‘in the heat of the moment’ – this includes using an object as a weapon stop an intruder running off – eg tackle them to the ground There’s no specific definition of ‘reasonable force’ – it depends on the circumstances. If you only did what you honestly thought was necessary at the time, this would provide strong evidence that you acted within the law. Read guidance from the Crown Prosecution Service. You don’t have to wait to be attacked before defending yourself in your home. However, you could be prosecuted if, for example, you: carry on attacking the intruder […] → Full article reasonable force against intruders

Frequently used words and phrases in the court room

FEQUENTLY USED WORDS AND PHRASES IN THE COURTROOM Affidavit A written statement made on oath, given in the place of verbal evidence Affirmation A declaration made instead of taking an oath Appellate Court/Jurisdiction Court or Jurisdiction which has the power to hear appeals Application A request made to a Court, eg., application for bail, application for an adjournment Arraign/ Arraignment The reading of the charges to the accused in a criminal matter and the recording of the accused’s answers as to whether he/she pleads guilty or not guilty Balance of probabilities The onus or standard of proof required in civil matters Beyond reasonable doubt The onus of proof required in criminal cases. Burden of proof The obligation to prove what is alleged. In a criminal trial the burden of proof is upon the prosecution, the accused does not have to prove anything. In a civil trial it is the plaintiff or claiming party which has the onus of proof Case Conference A pre-trial hearing which initiates the hearing of the case in Court. Under the guidance of the Judge (in Crime) parties attempt to resolve issues prior to the formal trial commencing Charge (to jury) Directions given to the Jury […] → Full article Frequently used words and phrases in the court room

maritime/admiralty law conspiracy

Maritime Admiralty Law Conspiracy “Nothing in this world, nothing, works the way you think it does. There’s always more to the story.” – Jordan Maxwell Disclaimer: When I wrote this post I had no idea how popular it would become. I found the topic interesting to say the least and I thought my readers would as well. The materials available in this post are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. When you read anything online, don’t let it be the ending point in your research, rather let it be the beginning. I recommend that you do your own research and investigations on any topic and come to your own conclusions. I added source links at the end of this post so you can begin to connect the dots yourself. Is it possible that these nautical terms were merely transferred to the land when transportation became more regionalized with the advent of trains and motor vehicles? It’s very possible. Either way, this post is meant to be food for thought! Maritime Have you noticed how many Maritime words are commonly used today? Maritime words relate to nautical, sea/ocean, shipping, and navigation. The term ‘Nautical’ […] → Full article maritime/admiralty law conspiracy

1 2 3 4

Privacy Notice

Warning - any person and/or institution and/or Agent and/or Agency of any governmental structure including but not limited to the United States Federal Government and/or the Government of the British Isles also using or monitoring/using this website or any of its associated websites, you do NOT have my permission to utilise any of my profile information nor any of the content contained herein including, but not limited to my photos, and/or the comments made about my photos or any other "picture" art posted on my profile. You are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, disseminating, or taking any other action against me with regard to this profile and the contents herein. The foregoing prohibitions also apply to your employee , agent , student or any persons under your direction or control. The contents of this profile are private and legally privileged and confidential information, and the violation of my personal privacy is punishable by United Sates law. UCC 1-103 1-308 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. And by United Kingdom (British) Law. The Human Rights Act 1998 (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents) Human Rights Act 1998 www.legislation.gov.uk An Act to give further effect to rights and freedoms guaranteed under the European Convention on Human Rights; to make provision with respect to holders of certain judicial offices who become judges of the European Court of Human Rights; and for connected purposes.

Valuable links

Use the links below for valuable information on rights and law.
Know your Rights
I am some dude
Wayne Glew